Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.
Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues. With control over the Philippines Beveridge saw an opportunity to secure an Asian empire with access to Asian markets and naval control over the Pacific.
In addition to benefits to the U. However, Beveridge makes assumptions based on Anglo-Saxon supremacy that cannot be looked over.
He does not consider the wants and freedoms of the Filipinos and assumes that the U. While Beveridge has strong, attractive arguments to keep the Philippines: In his speech, Beveridge delivers a strong economic and military argument for keeping the Philippines.
He argues that control over the Philippines gives the U. European powers have colonies to manufactured goods to, so in order to keep up, the U. Beveridge also points out that bases at the Philippines would give the U. In general, a pacific empire would counter-act the great European empires that had already claimed colonies in Africa, India, Latin America, India, the Middle East, and elsewhere.
This was not uncommon during the time period; other European empires justified their colonies as part of their plan to develop the rest of the world.
Beveridge shares this belief. In reality he is a racist and is actually aiming to subjugate other people for his own benefit. While says he wants to help the Filipinos, he fails to realize that they never actually asked for help.
Like other imperial nations throughout history, he seems to think that developed countries have the right and duty to intervene in other countries and assumes that the people of those countries are willing to be subjugated, ruled by a race totally different from themselves, and even in some cases stripped of their culture.
While imperial countries claim to be trying to aid in the development of those countries, they always have selfish motives behind it, like trying to gain resources, get access to new markets, or gain land to place military bases.
As it turns out, the U. As one would predict, unhappy with their oppression, the Filipinos ended up rebelling under their leader Emilio Aguinaldo, and rather than helping the Filipinos, the U. In his speech begging the U. However, if one looks closely, Beveridge turns out to be a racist and fails to consider the actual well-being and rights of the Filipino people.
More essays like this:The Many Shades of Manifest Destiny Manifest Destiny had its share of promoters. But, rather promote the Doctrine under its real name, several aliases were used. Albert Beveridge justifies American imperialism in his speech, which hinges on ideas of manifest destiny and social Darwinism.
He asserts that Americans are “a mighty people that He has planted on this soil; a people sprung from the most masterful blood of history” and that because they are God’s chosen people, they are obliged to %(2). ALBERT J. BEVERIDGE: In Support of an American Empire.
Source: Record, 56 Cong., I Sess., pp. MR.
now, when we are at last one people, strong enough for any task, great enough for any glory destiny can bestow? How comes it that our first century closes with the process of consolidating the American people into a unit just.
Manifest Destiny in s America – Essay Sample The term ‘manifest destiny’ has been heard in many classrooms throughout the United States.
The idea was a complicated mix of national ambition and religious fervor. American Exceptionalism and Manifest Destiny Essay Sample. American Exceptionalism: Belief that U.S.A. is historically and politicaly a completely unique nation and therefor superior to other nations (Hebel ).
Albert Beveridge, an enthusiastic imperialist, was campaigning for the Indiana senator seat in when he delivered The March of the Flag speech. The speech, which was published later in the Indianapolis Journal, was pronounced one month after the signing of armistice.